Guitar | Bass | Keyboard | Microphones | Mixers | Audio Interfaces | Monitors | Sequencers | Soft Synths | Live Sound | Drums | Club | Accessories | Blowouts
|
How to Process
|
![]() Note the 6 vocal channels in a recent "pop" composition. Vocal 2 and 3 are panned left and right for harmonies. Notice the 3 "FX" channels on top for "accents". You can see I merely cut these away from the main vocal track. Also at the end you see a vocal effect with 3 stacked tracks. |
Now you can make alternate vocal channels--perhaps
one for choruses, a few for effects, one for doubling and perhaps one for
sampling. You can cut up the vocal in the sequencer and put different
parts on different tracks with different effects. The most obvious here is
to put the choruses on a track with more processing to make them stand
out a little more. I also develop a set of tracks for doubling as
well where the vocals are hard panned left and right and playback two different
takes of the same chorus for that classic thick sound.
Vocal processors
TC Helicon Voiceworks Plus Vocal Processor
Roland
VP7 Vocal Processor
Electro-Harmonix Voice Box Vocal Harmony Machine and Vocoder Pedal
TC
Helicon VoiceTone Correct Vocal Effects Pedal
TC
Helicon VoiceTone Create Vocal Effects Pedal
iTech Vocal 300 Vocal Effects Processor Pedalboard |
It happens all the time, the vocalist gives a stellar performance on a chorus but came in late. With any vocal track in a sequencer you can slice it up by words, even syllables to make it fit in time if you need to. It's a good idea not to trash bad vocal takes as later on you may find all you need is one word to replace a botched word in the choice track. The joys of processing vocals in a sequencer is that you can mix and match segments from many takes down to one. This is called a composite vocal track. Yep, it's true, some of the stuff you hear on the radio might actually be a composite of 3-30 takes. The performance may have never existed in reality. Ever wonder why some unnamed Divas can't sing their song live very well? Of course a truly great vocalist will nail the track in one take. If one of these happen to be in your studio, send them to me. :) "We'll make you a star!" [no--don't really use that overused line]
You might not think your vocalist needs it. If they are rock on pitch, they might not. However, if you listen to most popular songs you will find that most vocal tracks are pitched perfectly, dead on. How many slightly off key notes do you hear on the radio? None! How many slightly off pitch notes are in your vocal track? C'mon, dude, be honest. 10? 30? 50? Uh huh, Case in Point! Even the best singers will have days when certain notes are consistently a little sharp or flat. Even the best vocalists benefit from some pitch correction, and a bad vocalist (like me) might actually get by with correction. A good pitch correction processor will gently (or abruptly, if you want) bend the note to the exact perfect center of the pitch, and you can also add vibrato and even wilder yodel like effects if you want. After building the composite track, correcting timing and pitch errors, you should mixdown the vocal track to a new file. This way you can remove any plugin processors used so far and clear automation to start fresh as you go into the next round. You also can go back to your source tracks at any time if you screw something up.
Melodyne and Auto-Tune are popular ways to correct and tweak pitch after the vocal has been recorded. I just wrote a comparison on audo-pro-central that you should check out if you are interested in these. Logic also has its own pitch corrector that is quite similar to Auto-Tubes Automatic mode. Waves has a pitch correction processor in it's bundles.
Waves De-Breath plugin from the
Waves
Vocal Bundle
Here's some things to do in an audio editor which may enhance the track
before you add plugins. Track cleaning. Open your newly mixed main
vocal in an audio editor. We are going to clean the track. Here you
zero out (silence) all the dead space between phrasings. Breath
control. A long debated question is: Do you keep the vocalist's
breaths in the recording or zero them out? If you take out all the
breaths, the vocal will sound strange. Certain breaths are very musical,
like the ones leading up to a loud part. However, there are usually some
that are excessive or out of sync, or just get in the way. Those are the
ones to remove. Remember you still have your source files in case you botch
this. Gain Optimization. Look for words that do not ring out as
clearly or may get buried in the music. If you built a composite track you
might have different takes at different levels. You want them all to sit up in
the audio editor in the same way if possible. Here you can use normalization to
good use. But don't normalize the whole track, normalize whole phrases.
This brings the soft ones up to the same level as the loud ones.
In
the main vocal track, start with compression to smooth out the levels a little
more. Since you compressed going in, you may not need much. However,
I find it to be real important to keep the vocal consistently above the music.
If you are hearing too many "SSS" sounds in the vocal, it is time to apply a de-esser.
After compression, it gets exciting. No not like that, but with an exciter. An exciter essentially gives you "sheen" on the high
frequencies by adding harmonics to the source signal. This is more than
the boost that EQ gives. An exciter actually adds harmonics that were not
present in the original signal while an eq just raises the volume of those that
were buried. With a combination of eq and excitement, you can get the
vocal as bright and crispy as you want it. Most popular records have
vocals processed with great brightness. It increases intelligibility and
makes the vocal sound "clear" even on inferior car and boom box speakers.
Now that we have our main vocal channel set, we move to the sends and returns.
Here we put the "common" effects that may be used for all the vocal tracks and
even for some instrument tracks as well. Of course I am talking about
reverb here. On our software or hardware mixer, route a send to an effect.
In the software mixer, you create a bus and put a reverb on it and send the
signal to this destination from the send knob on the vocal track. On a
hardware mixer the "aux send" goes out the back and goes to an effects box.
the output of the effects box comes back to the mixer via the returns. Its
a common mistake to use too much reverb so don't overdo it. Other
excellent effects that can be applied here are delays. Just a little bit goes a
long way, especially when you also have reverb running.
Software processors | |
Antares AVOX Evo Vocal Software (Mac and Windows)![]() Antares Harmony Engine Evo Vocal Modeling Harmony Generator Software (Mac and Windows) ![]()
Waves Vocal Bundle Plug-Ins |
If you listen to my stuff, you know I am a big fan of "spot effects" which is done simply by putting part of the main vocal track on a different track with strong effects. Some effects that can be used on different tracks are harmony processors, radical EQs for lo fi effects, vocoders, extreme delays and reverbs, distortion, and whatever else you feel helps make the artistic statement.
Because your main vocal tracks are centered,
for effects you may want to move them off center. This adds a little more
dimension. Remember a good effect is one that defines it's difference
relative to a norm. So your main tracks should be dead center, loud and
clear, full and rich. Your effects tracks can be of great contrast, i.e.,
all the lows removed, all the high's removed, totally gnarled, nothing but
reversed echoes, whatever.
Don't forget, you can use your
soft or hard sampler for vocal effects too. Toss the whole vocal file in
recycle, slice it, then port it over to the EXS, Kontakt, your E-mu for some
dangerous keyboard controlled effects, like stutters, filter swept voices, LFO
Mods.
Your sequencer has automation, use it. As the
Mix plays, not any sections where the vocal needs a boost or a cut. Draw
them in. Grouping If you have a multi output audio
interface and enough busses on your mixing board you can consider making a
"group" for just the vocals. This can also be called a vocal "submix".
Rather than having each vocal track set to different mixer channels, route them
all, post insert effects, to a single group channel. This gives you one
fader that raises lowers all the vocal tracks. It is important when
getting the overall level of the vocal set against the context of the music.
You may use automation on this bus too.
So we are almost done. We worked
hard to get here, but all of the work is in vain if the final level is not set
correctly. The whole point of all this compression, excitement, eq, and
post processing was to get a vocal that sits up in the mix properly, where every
word is intelligible, where the track never gets drowned out by instrumental
tracks but does not drown them out either. Be real careful with the final
fader tweaks. Try to get the vocal where it "floats" on top of the mix in
a nice way. Pan other instruments to the sides that might compete with the
vocalist's sweet spot and avoid putting so much reverb on the voice so it sound
like it is behind the instruments. You might try doing 3 or 4 mixes at different
setting for the overall vocal just so you can listen elsewhere to critically
evaluate the level.
After you
mix your final wave file, you still have one more chance to touch up the vocal
during the final mastering process, which will be burned to CD. A good
quality parametric EQ can touch up the frequency response of the vocal's sheen
(as well as the entire mix's overall frequency balance.) You shouldn't
have to do much here, since you were so careful during the recording and
processing of your mix. But a little bit of eq or multi band compression
can raise or lower the "temperature" of the mix quite dramatically.
Ideally though, you will have your vocal perfectly tweaked before the mastering
phase.
<Tweak Pauses> "Ok lets go to questions"
Q) I have a harmony processor. Uh, where does it go in the recording chain? It has a mic input. | Q) How do i get vocal effects like on Cher's "Believe"? I heard it was done with a Vocoder. |
A) Of course you can record through it up front, and sometimes you may want to do that. However, you are stuck with the result later and it cant be changed. I would put it as an insert on a vocal channel of your mixer. That way you can tweak the settings later on and get them to fit perfectly with your song. | A) Nope. It was done with a pitch/intonation processor, like Antares AutoTune. You get that effect by "abusing" the settings. You tell autotune you are singing only Ab and and Eb notes and you sing F and C notes. Auto tune will bend your vocal notes to the closest selected pitch giving that "yodel-like" sound |
Q) I want my vocal to stutter at points as an effect. How do I do this? Should I slice it up on an audio track and use copy and paste? | Q) How do I get "formant" processing effects? and err, what is that. |
A) That works. A sampler works better though as you can control it with MIDI. This allows very fast 32nd note stutters which would be very tedious copying and pasting. If you use a sampler you can also modulate it with a square wave LFO so it stutters through the whole waveform, not just repeat the attack. | A) Formant processing is a "modeling" technique where a digital model of a vocal cavity is applied to audio material. You can turn a male voice into a female voice for example and many more wild things. You need hardware or software that does this, like Kontakt or a Roland Variphrase |
If you use my advice above you'll find that
your vocals can really stand out in the mix. Like any other recording
technique, getting a good vocal takes practice. Naturally all the gear in
the world is not going to make a great vocal performance, but using some of the
tweaks above you'll find that a good performance will really shine through and
dazzle your audiences.
Go to the Next Class
Go to the Previous Class
Want to discuss this article? Go to the Forum on Mics, Pre-Amps and compressors
Cool Quote: "Anything that is too stupid to be spoken is sung." Voltaire, 1694-1778) Social Critic |
More Articles on Microphones and Preamps by Tweak
Mics and Preamps Index of Articles
Microphones Introduction
Mics under $100
Set up a Vocal Session
How to Process Vocal Tracks
Recording Vocals
ShureSM81
M-audio Solaris
Cad E200
Mic Preamps
High Quality Mic Preamps
Great River ME1-NV
FMR's Really Nice Preamp
Voicemaster pro
Shure SM7b
Sennheiser MD421
Rode NT1a
ElectroVoice RE20
TLM 103 by Neumann
Shure SM57
Microphone Prices
Prices of Mic Preamps
TweakHeadz Lab | Studio-Central | Audio-Pro-Central | Master INDEX | Store Affiliations | Site Map | Support the Lab | Privacy Policy | © 1999-2021 TweakHeadz.com |